CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
I went to the High Court as a party to a land
case. I have been going to the court for the past eleven years on this
particular case.
When
I got to the main entrance I declared the content of my small bag as part of
the court’s security checks.
The items in the bag comprised a power
bank, a mi-fi, a camera and a book. Upon seeing my camera one of the security men
told me that cameras are not allowed in the courtrooms. I hesitated and drew
his attention to the fact that my phone equally has a camera. He said yes he
knows and that I am allowed to take my phone but not the camera.
He patiently and courteously explained to
me that they are only following instructions.
He then requested that I follow him out of
the building for him to show me something. I obliged. When we got to the entrance
of the newly constructed state-of-the art court building he pointed at a banner with a bold inscription: NO PHOTOGRAPHS.
The Forty-two Courtroom Complex
Please to those who are LEARNED I think I am
faced with a “constitutional crisis” and I need an “interpretation”. Does NO
PHOTOGRAPHS mean CAMERAS ARE NOT ALLOWED? What about my phone’s camera?
Remember, the security man is just
following a directive.

No comments:
Post a Comment